Skip to main content

About your Search

Search Results 0 to 0 of about 1
Mar 24, 2013 3:05pm EDT
balance has completely changed. people think the u.s. has much more influence and is not wielding the influence it could have. people ask, why does the u.s. not do more to contain some of maliki's worst instincts? better do they not do a job balancing the different communities within iraq? and you can ask a follow-up question. >> how should the united states be doing that, and then i would love to hear from the others. how do you all believe the united states should be read calibrating its relationship -- re-calibrating its relationship, and to build on the point, if the natural allies of the united states are those more secularin government, how do you do so in a zero sum nature of iraqi politics without further worsening relationship with maliki? the think people believe u.s. debt on maliki in 2010. rather than -- bet on maliki in 2010. rather than long-term investments, it was seen as maliki is the guy. but the long term interest is for iraq to be more democratic. it is never going to be a liberal democracy in the gulf. but as the ambassador said, it is a strategic framework ag
Search Results 0 to 0 of about 1